Sunday 19 October 2014

Aaron Murray Engaged: Andi And Josh Mad Their Wedding Is Being Upstaged?

Kansas City Chiefs QB Aaron Murray’s family is excited about his engagement to his long-time girlfriend, Kacie McDonnell. Well, everyone except his big brother Josh Murray and his fiancee, Bachelorette Andi Dorfman. The reality TV stars haven’t uttered a word on social media about the Aaron’s big news, and they were not present for the big Murray family engagement celebration last week.
Aaron proposed to Kacie last week in Kansas City, surrounded by the whole Murray clan, with Andi and Josh noticeably missing. Within days of their October 10 engagement, Kacie revealed on Instagram that plans for a Philadelphia wedding were underway, leaving many Bachelorette fans wondering if Andi and Josh are mad that their wedding is being upstaged by Aaron and Kacie.
Aaron Murray Engaged
Perhaps they didn’t show up at the engagement celebration because Andi is not in good graces with Josh’s family. Celeb Dirty Laundry claims that the Murray family “hates Andi” — but it wasn’t always that way. Apparently Josh’s family was fine with Andi right up until the After the Final Rose special aired. Remember when Nick Viall blurted out that Andi slept with him? That apparently didn’t go over so well with Mr. and Mrs. Murray, so that could be why Andi and Josh were not in Kansas City to celebrate Aaron and Kacie’s engagement last week.
Of course, it’s also possible that the Bachelorette couple weren’t able to make it to Kansas City on the night of Aaron’s engagement because they were attending a Bridal Fashion week in NYC. Wet Paint reports that Andi and Josh were invited to several events related to Kleinfeld’s 2015 wedding gown collection, which was probably a paid appearance.
The bride-to-be made it sound like she went to New York to pick out her wedding dress, but that didn’t happen. The couple cheesed it up for the cameras, but managed to repeatedly dodge the “when’s the wedding” question. To top it off, they were surrounded by all-things-bridal and never once mentioned Aaron and Kacie’s engagement during their interviews with the press.
“Yesss! Couture Bridal Fashion week and NYC… Here @joshmurray11 and I come! Pumped to see it with @kleinfeldbridal! Wedding time! @kleinfeldpaper #weddingdress #fashion #happygirl.”

Andi and Josh got engaged on May 9, and have mentioned many times that they are excited about getting married. Although they have only been engaged for five months, there must be a reason they haven’t announced a wedding date. Could it be that the Murray family feud is real, or are they just holding out hope that ABC will offer them a pile of cash to get married on TV?

Thursday 16 October 2014

MILLION DOLLAR LISTING LA: Josh Altman Admits, ‘All My Fault’ Wedding’s Off

It’s official, Heather Bilyeu and Josh Altman have stopped planning a wedding on MILLION DOLLAR LISTING LOS ANGELES.
The last straw was another “Oops” moment by Altman. He forgot about the couple’s plans to meet with a florist. He was posing for a photo by brother Matt as he tried on his wedding tux.
Heather hung up on him, which according to Josh Altman, was a rare occurrence. He knew he was in deep trouble and became a bit unglued, which was unfortunate timing because he and Matt were scooting off to a prestigious property for a listing appointment at the prestigious Chandler mansion.
Until he got home that evening and the pair made their decision to halt all wedding plans, Josh Altman was trying to keep it in perspective, but fumbled his way through the appointment relying on Matt to carry the ball.
“The call with Heather really rattled me and I’m a mess,” he said. It’s just a flower appointment.” We all know that sometimes a flower appointment isn’t just a flower appointment.
A man like Josh Altman is used to getting what he wants by working hard to make it so, moving mountains, cajoling, finding a way and outlasting the competition. He stopped doing that with Heather and to his credit he admitted it in some of the most awkward scenes ever on MILLION DOLLAR LISTING LA.
“We had a long conversation last night and the wedding’s off. This is all my fault,” he told Matt on the day after the final decision was made.
“From the beginning she wanted a small wedding and I kept inviting people. I wasn’t even paying attention. I’m definitely scared. I don’t know if it’s something I can salvage. I don’t know where to go from here.”
When Matt asked, “You guys still love each other, right?” A beleaguered Altman said, “I don’t know.”
It looks like that’s the easiest question to answer. Yes, they do. For those that loathe Altman’s persona on the show, you may enjoy the fact that the dreaded couple’s counseling sessions are in his future.
He resisted the suggestion and unless brother Matt had encouraged it, who knows if he would have agreed or even thought the process was worthwhile.

MILLION DOLLAR LISTING LA has seen it’s share of personal sorrow, and there is more to come as Edith Flagg’s illness progresses throughout the season, but for right now, the golden couple is struggling to survive.

Tuesday 14 October 2014

Thank you wedding industry for sapping the joy out of getting married

It’s breaking my heart, and my bank balance. The wedding of my dreams is out of reach. When my boyfriend proposed this summer, I knew exactly how I wanted us to pledge our troth: a trip to the registry office, and then a drink in the pub with all of our favourite people. There would be dancing. There would be chips. How hard could it be?
Wedding cake figurines on stacks of coins
Well, so far it’s cost me £500 – not a large sum, post-Clooney and Alamuddin, but a month’s rent all the same – and I have yet to procure any food, booze, rings, clothes, entertainment or celebrants. I just put down a deposit on a fairly modest venue, because the going-to-the-pub plan turned out, in practice, to be as easy as procuring diamond confetti, or making and serving 9,000 lobster vol-au-vents, or attempting to ride down the aisle on a giant mongoose. If we want to have everyone we love in the same room, toasting us and dancing to Toto’s Africa, we either wait for the pub that will accommodate us all to be built, or we have a “Big Wedding”.
So I was a little irritated to hear that the more you spend on your marriage, the more likely it is that divorce is around the corner. According to a study by economics professors at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, women whose weddings cost more than $20,000 (£12,444) are 3.5 times more likely to divorce than those who spend between $5,000 and $10,000 (£3,111-£6,222).
Pre-engagement, I would have responded to this with a smug “duh!”. No party should cost more than £70 – enough for five bottles of white wine, some Pringles and a prawn ring. But as soon as you start feeling your obligations as a host – it’s the sort of party people will come a long way for, and you want to make sure they have something to eat, somewhere to drink and somewhere warm and dry to sit – you enter the grim, pinched world of people who look you up and down and say that if you’d like them to cover up the electrical wiring protruding from the wall it will be another £4,000.
Planners fall over themselves to tell you that your “special day” must be an expression of your personalities and relationship, but it’s best if you express yourself with an entree of boiled chicken wrapped in cold, greasy bacon at £90 a head. People who look forward to their own engagement instigate dreamy discussions about flowers and frocks; meanwhile, people who are recently married or about to be share gloomy stories about how they thought it would be easier to buy in their own booze until the venue rang up three days before the wedding to announce they were introducing a new and punishing fee for corkage.
Rebecca Mead, author of One Perfect Day: The Selling of the American Wedding pointed the finger at our princess complexes. Plenty of women hear the message that we are our weddings – when the world conspires to make us feel fat, frumpy and inadequate, we can have 24 hours of pretending, while wearing a tiara, that we’re special. But it’s in the interest of the salon owner, the dress designer and the make-up artist to tell us we’re “worth” their fees. When you’re organising a party for more than 100 people and you’re too tired to say no, it can feel like it’s easier to just keep handing your credit card over.

Ultimately, I’m not too worried about what my wedding will cost. I suspect the trick is to think of it as the most complicated party you will ever throw, and not the best day of your life. I want my wedding to be the first day of a union, not like the last days of Versailles. As long as we can make sure everyone has a lovely time without going into debt, that’s all I can really hope for. But if you know of anywhere that specialises in mongoose hire, please do get in touch.

Sunday 12 October 2014

Franconia honors army veteran on his wedding day

Army Capt. Steve Walters received the hero’s welcome home he deserved Sunday, with his blushing bride at his side.
The 25-year-veteran, who served multiple combat tours during the first Gulf War, and more recently in Iraq and Afghanistan, was escorted with wife, Michele, on their wedding day Oct. 12 by his fellow members of the American Legion Riders Post 234. Walters is set to retire from the army next year.
The large procession into the parking lot of Family Heritage Restaurant in Franconia for the wedding reception was quite a memorable site. Members of the Telford and Souderton Fire Companies parked two fire trucks facing each other and used the trucks’ ladders to hang a 30 by 40 foot American flag into the air, in order for the procession of motorcycles and cars to travel underneath. A band of bikers then pulled into the lot, playing patriotic music, followed by the newlyweds inside their purple Dodge Challenger, a few more bikers and the rest of the wedding party bringing up the rear.
“I’ll tell you what,” the 45-year-old Walters began, after the procession ended, “what our local fire fighters, what our Legion Riders have done here, the support that we have gotten has been absolutely amazing. We could not ask for a better day all the way around.”
The couple, who’ve been together for almost five years said this was an incredible way to celebrate one of the most important dates in their lives.
“I had no idea,” Michele said. “So I got a little teary eyed because it’s very awesome to see our flag anywhere, but that size on our special day is just awesome.”
While Walters admitted to helping plan the escort with the Legion Riders, he didn’t expect the overwhelming show of support they received.
“I had asked for a four to six man detail,” Walters said. “We had 60 riders. It was absolutely amazing. And their chief, they said to us, ‘we have something a little extra planned for you.’ So what we have here is that something little extra with this tremendous flag and all the support you could ever ask for.”
American Legion Rider member Nancy Buck, who helped organize the event, said the escort was about celebrating the special day and honoring Walters for his service.

“That’s his career. He’s military. He’s been awarded the silver star,” she said. “And he’s been with this woman for a long time and they finally got married. And he is a member of our post, so we’re definitely going to honor him. That’s why we did this.”

Wednesday 8 October 2014

Are diamonds really a girl's best friend? What your ring may say about your marriage

If you like it, you should definitely put a ring on it ... but maybe not too big of a ring.
Few things set engaged couples into the boxing ring faster than just how much to spend on their wedding, but a new study from Emory University economics professors indicates that moderation in all things leads to a longer union.
"'A Diamond is Forever' and Other Fairy Tales: The Relationship between Wedding Expenses and Marriage Duration," a new study from Andrew M. Francis and Hugo M. Mialon, isn't just one of the first looks at how wedding spending correlates with marriage duration — it's also an indictment of the persuasive powers of the wedding industry.
The pair surveyed 3,000 U.S. adults who had once been married to a member of the opposite sex and discovered you should:
Spend no more than $2,000 on the engagement ring
Men who shelled out between $2,000-$4,000 on engagement rings were 1.3 times more likely to get divorced than men who spent between $500 and $2,000. But that doesn't mean you should just use a plastic ring you got out of a gumball machine, either. Spending less than $500 on a ring also led to higher divorce rates.
Keep your wedding costs under control
Spending more than $20,000 on a wedding led to divorce 3.5 times more frequently for women than for those who spent between $5,000 and $10,000. (The average cost of an American wedding is nearly $30,000, according to The Knot.) And maybe a reception at a fast food restaurant is warranted: Spending less than $1,000 on a wedding decreased chances of divorce.
But have a big guest list and honeymoon
Good news! You can invite everybody to your low-budget wedding, and head off to Niagara Falls afterwards. The study discovered that high wedding attendance and a honeymoon (regardless of cost) "are positively associated with marriage duration."
"In 1959, Bride’s [magazine] recommended that couples set aside 2 months to prepare for their wedding and published a checklist with 22 tasks for them to complete," the authors of the study (which can be viewed in full here) noted. "By the 1990s, the magazine recommended 12 months of wedding preparation and published a checklist with 44 tasks to complete."
And if you're too busy driving yourself around the bend planning that big lavish wedding to read the study, here's the sum-up: "Our findings provide little evidence to support the validity of the wedding industry’s general message that connects expensive weddings with positive marital outcomes."

Burgers and fries for all!

Monday 6 October 2014

WI LGBT Chamber of Commerce says next month’s “LGBT Wedding Expo” at capacity for vendors

The Supreme Court announced Monday it is staying out of the same-sex marriage debate — at least for now — rejecting requests from five states to immediately review their bans that prohibit gay and lesbian couples from civil wedlock. The rejected appeals originated from same-sex couples in Utah, Oklahoma, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Indiana. With Monday’s order, lower appeals court rulings striking down the bans could soon be enforced in those five states. That also means bans in all the other states covered by the three circuit appeals courts would also be invalidated. Those states include West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Kansas, Colorado, and Wyoming. Same-sex marriage would then be permitted in 30 states.
The Supreme Court’s announcement Monday means Wisconsin same-sex couples can now begin planning their weddings. That could translate into millions of dollars for Wisconsin’s wedding industry.
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s announcement, the Wisconsin LGBT Chamber of Commerce has announced it is sponsoring an LGBT Wedding Expo on November 13th.
The wedding expo will be held from 4:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. at the Radisson Milwaukee West by Mayfair Mall.
“We were all really excited and kind of anticipating that a decision would be made,” Radisson Social Event Manager Brian Peterson said.
wedding expo
With nearly a month to go before the event, the LGBT Chamber of Commerce says it has already reached capacity with the number of vendors that can fit into the space — and the Chamber says it has received countless calls from couples looking to plan their big day that want to do business with those that share their values.
“We’ve got a lot of great buzz around it. Great vendors signed up for it already,” Peterson said.
Unlike in early June, when couples rushed to county clerk’s offices to marry, same-sex couples now have the chance to plan a wedding months in advance.
“Talking to different businesses and even people in the community, finally, finally this is happening,” Peterson said.
“Today I already got give calls from individuals who once their heard about the decision, wanted to start planning their special day,” Jason Rae, the executive director of the Wisconsin LGBT Chamber of Commerce said.
The Wisconsin LGBT Chamber of Commerce is expecting same-sex marriage to have an economic impact in the millions of dollars.
“In Illinois, they predicted with marraige equality they would get about $54 million to $103 million spent within the first three years alone on same-sex weddings,” Rae said.
Hawaiian caterer Ono Kine Grinz is hoping to win some of that new business.
“I think it opens new horizons for catering businesses,” David Lau with Ono Kine Grinz Catering said.
Ono Kine Grinz is already on the list of caterers for the LGBT Wedding Expo.
“This will be new for us too and we’re excited about it. I think we all have a human need to be accepted and loved in society and I think that we’ll all come out as a better person,” Guy Roeseler with Ono Kine Grinz Catering said.
Jason Rae, executive director of the Wisconsin LGBT Chamber of Commerce, issued the following statement in response to the Supreme Court’s decision not to take up the appeal of Wisconsin’s discriminatory marriage amendment:
“Not only did the US Supreme Court affirm the right of all of Wisconsin’s citizens to marry who they love, the Court also paved the way to help strengthen our state’s economy. At the Wisconsin LGBT Chamber of Commerce, we are incredibly excited about the economic impact that this decision will have for our members and for our state economy as a whole.
In a short-term sense, the benefits are clear. Weddings are very expensive, and an influx of marriages means a great deal of spending is happening all at once, and better yet it’s happening locally. A study done last year by the Williams Institute at UCLA predicted that marriage equality in Illinois would generate $54 to $103 million in new spending in the state over the first three years that marriage is allowed.
The providers of wedding flowers, food, music, and venues are all local, and likely small businesses. Whereas our neighboring state used to benefit from Wisconsin same-sex couples travelling across the border to get married, now Wisconsin businesses reap the rewards of these nuptials, and the state keeps the sales tax revenues as well. While the exact numbers in Wisconsin are unclear, it is clear that same-sex marriage will bring a welcome boost to our state economy and tax rolls for years to come.
The immediate benefits of marriage equality provide millions of dollars of stimulus to local businesses, but the short-term benefits do not even begin to tell the whole story. These new marriages create families in Wisconsin that will have a lasting, observable impact on our economy.
Marriage equality helps Wisconsin recruit and retain diverse talent. People want to move to and live in a place that is welcoming and accepting of who they are. In today’s global economy, potential employees could go anywhere they wanted. If we want to keep the best and brightest here in our state, showing our inclusivity through marriage equality is one way to do that. Because of the federal decision, we don’t need to worry about people leaving Wisconsin and heading to Illinois or Minnesota where they can be respected in their entirety. This in and of it self is a key component of how we grow our business community. Having the best and brightest want to move here and work here is how we make sure our businesses thrive.

As Wisconsin’s LGBT families continue to grow and prosper, so too will our state economy. We look forward to seeing marriage equality translate into a positive force for our economy and local businesses, and consequently giving our state the best of both worlds.”

Friday 3 October 2014

After Being Fined for Refusing to Host Gay Weddings and Making a Stunning Business Decision, Christian Farm Owners Are Fighting Back

The owners of a family farm who are being fined $13,000 for refusing to host a gay wedding ceremony are taking action in an effort to overturn the state’s ruling against them.
An attorney for the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal firm, filed a petition in New York State court Thursday on behalf of Cynthia and Robert Gifford, owners of Liberty Ridge Farm, a farm and special events venue in Schaghticoke, New York.
The petition asks that the “sexual orientation discrimination” ruling given by the New York State Division of Human Rights in August be reexamined.
The legal battle touched off after the Giffords, who are Christians, told Jennifer McCarthy and Melisa Erwin, a lesbian couple from Newark, New Jersey, back in 2012 that they were welcome to hold their reception on the property, but not the actual wedding ceremony, according to Religion News Service.
As TheBlaze previously reported, The Giffords, who oppose same-sex marriage based on their religious convictions, live on the premises. Weddings are typically conducted on the first floor of their home or on the nearby property.
Two brides are send on a wedding cake at a press conference in Los Angeles, after the United States Supreme court ruled on Californias Proposition 8 and the federal Defense of Marriage Act, June 26, 2013. The US Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down a controversial federal law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, in a major victory for supporters of same-sex marriage. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) had denied married gay and lesbian couples in the United States the same rights and benefits that straight couples have long taken for granted. Credit: AFP/Getty Images
McCarthy and Erwin, angry over the rejection, took their grievances — and audio from their conversation with the farm owners that was reportedly secretly recorded — to New York’s Division of Human Rights, claiming that they were discriminated against as a result of their sexual orientation.
A judge agreed and the farm owners were fined $10,000 plus an additional $3,000 in damages for violating anti-discrimination regulations under New York’s Human Rights Law.
Additionally, the Alliance Defending Freedom claims that the Giffords have been ordered to train their staff in the state’s viewpoint on same-sex nuptials; New York legalized gay marriage in 2011.
The conservative legal firm’s appeal argues in Gifford v. New York State Division of Human Rights that the state “did not consider Robert and Cynthia’s constitutional freedoms and religious beliefs,” according to a press release.
“While the Giffords have asserted their constitutional religious protections as a defense to the discrimination allegations from the beginning, neither the Division, the Administrative Law Judge (the ‘ALJ’) or the Commissioner herself even mentioned those fundamental rights before compelling the family to either host and ‘celebrate’ same-sex wedding ceremonies in their own home, or go out of the wedding ceremony business altogether,” reads the appeal filed in court.
Attorneys for the Giffords argue that the family should be free to live according to their religious beliefs and that operating in the marketplace does not give the government the right to force an individual to give up his or her First Amendment rights.
“The commission demonstrated stunning disregard for the Giffords’ First Amendment rights, which were never considered at the hearing,” James Trainor, an allied attorney with Alliance Defending Freedom, said in a statement. “The commissioner’s order in essence gives an ultimatum: host same-sex marriage ceremonies or none at all.”
McCarthy spoke out about the fine waged against the Giffords back in August, saying that the family had no right to discriminate against her and that she’s hopeful the incident helps protect others’ rights.
“No one should have the happiest time of their life marred by discrimination,” McCarthy, who was represented alongside her wife by the New York Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement, according to the New York Law Journal. “We hope this decision will protect all New Yorkers from having to go through the hurt that we experienced.”
As TheBlaze previously reported, the Gifford family — as a result of the legal battle — has decided to no longer host any wedding ceremonies on their property.

“Going forward, [Cynthia and Robert Gifford] have decided to no longer host any wedding ceremonies on their property (other than the ones already under contract),” Trainor told TheBlaze. “Since the order essentially compelled them to do all ceremonies or none at all, they have chosen the latter in order to stay true to their religious convictions, even though it will likely hurt their business in the short run.”